Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TEMECULA VALLEY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TEMECULA VALLEY HOSPITAL
CCN 050775 | CA | 140 beds | Current EBITDA $18.5M → Pro Forma $31.2M (+$12.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$239.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$18.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$12.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$31.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$9.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$12.6M
Modeled Uplift
$9.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $9.5M (vs $12.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$153K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$12.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.8M$4.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.6M$132K$4.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$736K$2.2M$2.9M$9.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$153K$153K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$972K$1.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$77K$153K$153K$153K$153K$153K$153K
Cumulative$0$3.4M$6.9M$10.2M$12.6M$12.6M$12.6M$12.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $12.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.2x64% / 11.7x68% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.7x
9.0x54% / 8.7x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.4x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x
10.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
11.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
12.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.5x
Headroom (turns)
23%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 23% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.0x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$18.5M$18.5M7.7%
Year 1$19.1M+$8.4M$27.5M11.5%
Year 2$19.7M+$12.6M$32.3M13.5%
Year 3$20.3M+$12.6M$32.9M13.7%
Year 4$20.9M+$12.6M$33.5M14.0%
Year 5$21.5M+$12.6M$34.1M14.2%
$185.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$375.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$189.8M
Value Created
$34.1M
Exit EBITDA
$29.5M
Organic Growth
$126.1M
RCM Value Creation
$34.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$5.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.4M$3.6M$4.7M$5.7M
A/R Days Reduction$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M
Clean Claim Rate$77K$115K$153K$184K
Total$6.3M$9.5M$12.6M$15.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 198 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.7%-18.1%-3.9%4.7%
P81
Net-to-Gross16.5%18.1%22.5%29.2%
P18
Occupancy87.3%44.6%58.5%72.2%
P91
Rev/Bed$1.7M$660K$1.2M$2.2M
P65
Exp/Bed$1.6M$690K$1.5M$2.3M
P55

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML