Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KFH - ROSEVILLE 2026-04-26 03:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KFH - ROSEVILLE
CCN 050772 | CA | 352 beds | Current EBITDA $167.2M → Pro Forma $229.3M (+$62.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.18B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$167.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$62.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$229.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$45.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$62.1M
Modeled Uplift
$46.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$15.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $46.4M (vs $62.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$23.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$23.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$14.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$756K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$62.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$23.6M$23.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$22.7M$650K$23.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.6M$10.7M$14.4M$45.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$756K$756K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$5.9M$11.8M$17.7M$23.6M$23.6M$23.6M$23.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$5.8M$11.7M$17.5M$23.4M$23.4M$23.4M$23.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$4.8M$9.6M$14.4M$14.4M$14.4M$14.4M$14.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$378K$756K$756K$756K$756K$756K$756K
Cumulative$0$16.9M$33.8M$50.4M$62.1M$62.1M$62.1M$62.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $62.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.1x63% / 11.7x
9.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x
10.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
11.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x
12.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.3x
Headroom (turns)
5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.2x, adding 2.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$167.2M$167.2M14.2%
Year 1$172.2M+$41.4M$213.6M18.1%
Year 2$177.4M+$62.1M$239.5M20.3%
Year 3$182.7M+$62.1M$244.8M20.7%
Year 4$188.2M+$62.1M$250.3M21.2%
Year 5$193.8M+$62.1M$256.0M21.7%
$1.67B
Entry EV (10x)
$2.82B
Exit EV (11x)
$1.14B
Value Created
$256.0M
Exit EBITDA
$266.3M
Organic Growth
$621.5M
RCM Value Creation
$256.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$11.8M$17.7M$23.6M$28.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$11.7M$17.5M$23.4M$28.1M
A/R Days Reduction$7.2M$10.8M$14.4M$17.2M
Clean Claim Rate$378K$567K$756K$907K
Total$31.1M$46.6M$62.1M$74.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 156 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin14.2%-15.8%-4.2%3.7%
P95
Net-to-Gross30.7%17.6%22.6%28.9%
P83
Occupancy84.3%54.1%65.4%73.8%
P87
Rev/Bed$3.4M$1.3M$1.8M$2.6M
P88
Exp/Bed$2.9M$1.5M$2.0M$2.7M
P79

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML