Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KFH - VACAVILLE 2026-04-26 11:16 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KFH - VACAVILLE
CCN 050767 | CA | 144 beds | Current EBITDA $29.5M → Pro Forma $51.3M (+$21.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$415.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$29.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$21.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$51.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$15.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$21.9M
Modeled Uplift
$15.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.7M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $15.2M (vs $21.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$266K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$21.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.3M$8.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.0M$228K$8.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.3M$3.8M$5.1M$15.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$266K$266K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.2M$8.3M$8.3M$8.3M$8.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.1M$4.1M$6.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$133K$266K$266K$266K$266K$266K$266K
Cumulative$0$6.0M$11.9M$17.7M$21.9M$21.9M$21.9M$21.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $21.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.5x73% / 15.3x
9.0x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.5x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.5x68% / 13.2x
10.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.3x61% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x
11.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x
12.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.6x
Headroom (turns)
25%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 25% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.9x, adding 3.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$29.5M$29.5M7.1%
Year 1$30.3M+$14.6M$44.9M10.8%
Year 2$31.3M+$21.9M$53.1M12.8%
Year 3$32.2M+$21.9M$54.0M13.0%
Year 4$33.2M+$21.9M$55.0M13.2%
Year 5$34.1M+$21.9M$56.0M13.5%
$294.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$616.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$321.4M
Value Created
$56.0M
Exit EBITDA
$46.9M
Organic Growth
$218.5M
RCM Value Creation
$56.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.2M$6.2M$8.3M$10.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.1M$6.2M$8.2M$9.9M
A/R Days Reduction$2.5M$3.8M$5.1M$6.1M
Clean Claim Rate$133K$199K$266K$319K
Total$10.9M$16.4M$21.9M$26.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 201 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.1%-17.7%-3.9%4.5%
P81
Net-to-Gross26.2%18.2%22.5%29.2%
P62
Occupancy53.2%44.9%59.2%72.2%
P40
Rev/Bed$2.9M$686K$1.3M$2.2M
P87
Exp/Bed$2.7M$708K$1.5M$2.4M
P82

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML