Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MONTCLAIR HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MONTCLAIR HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050758 | CA | 106 beds | Current EBITDA $2.8M → Pro Forma $5.6M (+$2.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$54.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$2.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.8M (vs $2.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$668K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$35K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.1M$30K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$168K$499K$668K$2.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$35K$35K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$274K$549K$823K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$272K$543K$815K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$223K$445K$668K$668K$668K$668K$668K
Clean Claim Rate$0$18K$35K$35K$35K$35K$35K$35K
Cumulative$0$786K$1.6M$2.3M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.7x75% / 16.5x77% / 17.4x79% / 18.2x
9.0x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.7x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.1x74% / 15.9x
10.0x57% / 9.7x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.5x68% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x
11.0x53% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.7x65% / 12.4x
12.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.4x
Headroom (turns)
36%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 36% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.1x, adding 4.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.8M$2.8M5.0%
Year 1$2.8M+$1.9M$4.8M8.7%
Year 2$2.9M+$2.9M$5.8M10.6%
Year 3$3.0M+$2.9M$5.9M10.8%
Year 4$3.1M+$2.9M$6.0M10.9%
Year 5$3.2M+$2.9M$6.1M11.1%
$27.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$67.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$39.4M
Value Created
$6.1M
Exit EBITDA
$4.4M
Organic Growth
$28.9M
RCM Value Creation
$6.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$549K$823K$1.1M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$543K$815K$1.1M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$334K$501K$668K$801K
Clean Claim Rate$18K$26K$35K$42K
Total$1.4M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 172 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.0%-20.8%-4.7%4.2%
P78
Net-to-Gross21.4%17.6%22.3%30.6%
P42
Occupancy27.7%43.7%57.5%72.5%
P9
Rev/Bed$518K$550K$984K$2.1M
P23
Exp/Bed$492K$624K$1.1M$2.3M
P18

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML