Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SHERMAN OAKS HOSPITAL-HLTH 2026-04-26 12:29 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SHERMAN OAKS HOSPITAL-HLTH
CCN 050755 | CA | 112 beds | Current EBITDA $3.7M → Pro Forma $8.6M (+$4.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$93.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$4.9M
Modeled Uplift
$3.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.2M (vs $4.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$60K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.9M$1.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.8M$51K$1.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$286K$849K$1.1M$3.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$60K$60K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$466K$933K$1.4M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$462K$923K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$378K$757K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$30K$60K$60K$60K$60K$60K$60K
Cumulative$0$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x72% / 14.9x76% / 17.0x80% / 19.0x82% / 20.0x84% / 21.0x
9.0x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.7x75% / 16.5x77% / 17.4x79% / 18.3x
10.0x62% / 11.3x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.5x73% / 15.3x74% / 16.2x
11.0x58% / 10.0x63% / 11.4x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.7x70% / 14.4x
12.0x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.9x
Headroom (turns)
44%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 44% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.6x, adding 4.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.7M$3.7M4.0%
Year 1$3.8M+$3.3M$7.1M7.6%
Year 2$3.9M+$4.9M$8.8M9.5%
Year 3$4.0M+$4.9M$8.9M9.6%
Year 4$4.2M+$4.9M$9.1M9.7%
Year 5$4.3M+$4.9M$9.2M9.9%
$36.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$101.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$64.1M
Value Created
$9.2M
Exit EBITDA
$5.9M
Organic Growth
$49.1M
RCM Value Creation
$9.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$933K$1.4M$1.9M$2.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$923K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$568K$851K$1.1M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$30K$45K$60K$72K
Total$2.5M$3.7M$4.9M$5.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 181 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.0%-20.5%-4.6%4.4%
P73
Net-to-Gross21.9%17.8%22.5%30.6%
P44
Occupancy46.1%44.4%58.8%72.4%
P29
Rev/Bed$833K$589K$1.0M$2.1M
P42
Exp/Bed$800K$641K$1.2M$2.3M
P36

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML