Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KFH - MANTECA 2026-04-26 03:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KFH - MANTECA
CCN 050748 | CA | 213 beds | Current EBITDA $121.1M → Pro Forma $163.0M (+$41.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$796.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$121.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$41.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$163.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$30.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$41.9M
Modeled Uplift
$31.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$10.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $31.1M (vs $41.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$15.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$15.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$9.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$510K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$41.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$15.9M$15.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$15.3M$438K$15.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.4M$7.3M$9.7M$30.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$510K$510K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$4.0M$8.0M$12.0M$15.9M$15.9M$15.9M$15.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.9M$7.9M$11.8M$15.8M$15.8M$15.8M$15.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.2M$6.5M$9.7M$9.7M$9.7M$9.7M$9.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$255K$510K$510K$510K$510K$510K$510K
Cumulative$0$11.4M$22.8M$34.0M$41.9M$41.9M$41.9M$41.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $41.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x
9.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
10.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x
11.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.5x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x
12.0x33% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.2x
Headroom (turns)
3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.3x, adding 2.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$121.1M$121.1M15.2%
Year 1$124.7M+$27.9M$152.7M19.2%
Year 2$128.5M+$41.9M$170.4M21.4%
Year 3$132.3M+$41.9M$174.3M21.9%
Year 4$136.3M+$41.9M$178.2M22.4%
Year 5$140.4M+$41.9M$182.3M22.9%
$1.21B
Entry EV (10x)
$2.01B
Exit EV (11x)
$794.4M
Value Created
$182.3M
Exit EBITDA
$192.9M
Organic Growth
$419.2M
RCM Value Creation
$182.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$8.0M$12.0M$15.9M$19.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.9M$11.8M$15.8M$18.9M
A/R Days Reduction$4.8M$7.3M$9.7M$11.6M
Clean Claim Rate$255K$382K$510K$612K
Total$21.0M$31.4M$41.9M$50.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 209 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.2%-16.7%-4.0%4.4%
P94
Net-to-Gross29.8%17.2%22.3%28.9%
P78
Occupancy73.1%49.3%62.5%74.0%
P73
Rev/Bed$3.7M$1.0M$1.5M$2.4M
P96
Exp/Bed$3.2M$1.1M$1.7M$2.6M
P89

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML