Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ORANGE COUNTY GLOBAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 14:13 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ORANGE COUNTY GLOBAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050746 | CA | 254 beds | Current EBITDA $2.5M → Pro Forma $7.0M (+$4.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$83.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$4.4M
Modeled Uplift
$2.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.6M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.8M (vs $4.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$54K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.7M$1.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.6M$46K$1.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$258K$764K$1.0M$3.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$54K$54K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$420K$839K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$415K$831K$1.2M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$340K$681K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$27K$54K$54K$54K$54K$54K$54K
Cumulative$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x78% / 17.9x82% / 20.2x87% / 22.6x88% / 23.8x90% / 24.9x
9.0x73% / 15.5x78% / 17.6x82% / 19.7x83% / 20.8x85% / 21.8x
10.0x69% / 13.7x73% / 15.5x77% / 17.4x79% / 18.4x81% / 19.3x
11.0x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.8x73% / 15.5x75% / 16.4x77% / 17.2x
12.0x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.4x69% / 14.0x71% / 14.8x73% / 15.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.4x
Headroom (turns)
52%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 52% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.1x, adding 5.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.5M$2.5M3.0%
Year 1$2.6M+$2.9M$5.6M6.6%
Year 2$2.7M+$4.4M$7.1M8.5%
Year 3$2.8M+$4.4M$7.2M8.6%
Year 4$2.9M+$4.4M$7.3M8.7%
Year 5$3.0M+$4.4M$7.4M8.8%
$25.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$81.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$55.6M
Value Created
$7.4M
Exit EBITDA
$4.1M
Organic Growth
$44.2M
RCM Value Creation
$7.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$839K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$831K$1.2M$1.7M$2.0M
A/R Days Reduction$511K$766K$1.0M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$27K$40K$54K$64K
Total$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$5.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 191 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.0%-15.6%-4.0%4.7%
P71
Net-to-Gross24.2%17.1%22.1%28.4%
P58
Occupancy48.7%53.1%65.4%75.3%
P19
Rev/Bed$330K$1.1M$1.6M$2.5M
P2
Exp/Bed$320K$1.2M$1.8M$2.6M
P2

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML