Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CENTINELA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 13:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CENTINELA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050739 | CA | 267 beds | Current EBITDA $-9.6M → Pro Forma $3.1M (+$12.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$242.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-9.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$12.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$9.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$12.7M
Modeled Uplift
$8.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $8.7M (vs $12.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$155K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$12.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.8M$4.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.7M$133K$4.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$743K$2.2M$2.9M$9.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$155K$155K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$982K$2.0M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$77K$155K$155K$155K$155K$155K$155K
Cumulative$0$3.5M$6.9M$10.3M$12.7M$12.7M$12.7M$12.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $12.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-25.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
32.3x
Headroom (turns)
497%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 497% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -25.8x, adding 124.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-9.6M$-9.6M-4.0%
Year 1$-9.9M+$8.5M$-1.4M-0.6%
Year 2$-10.2M+$12.7M$2.6M1.1%
Year 3$-10.5M+$12.7M$2.3M0.9%
Year 4$-10.8M+$12.7M$1.9M0.8%
Year 5$-11.1M+$12.7M$1.6M0.7%
$-96.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$17.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$113.7M
Value Created
$1.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-15.3M
Organic Growth
$127.4M
RCM Value Creation
$1.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$5.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$5.8M
A/R Days Reduction$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M
Clean Claim Rate$77K$116K$155K$186K
Total$6.4M$9.6M$12.7M$15.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 190 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.0%-14.7%-3.9%4.7%
P49
Net-to-Gross21.9%17.1%22.3%28.8%
P47
Occupancy65.4%53.9%65.6%76.1%
P48
Rev/Bed$907K$1.2M$1.7M$2.5M
P15
Exp/Bed$943K$1.3M$1.8M$2.6M
P15

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML