Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GARFIELD MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 14:30 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GARFIELD MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050737 | CA | 182 beds | Current EBITDA $-130.6M → Pro Forma $-121.0M (+$9.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$183.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-130.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$9.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-121.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$9.6M
Modeled Uplift
$6.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $6.7M (vs $9.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$117K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$9.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.7M$3.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.5M$101K$3.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$561K$1.7M$2.2M$7.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$117K$117K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$915K$1.8M$2.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$906K$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$742K$1.5M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$59K$117K$117K$117K$117K$117K$117K
Cumulative$0$2.6M$5.2M$7.8M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $9.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-130.6M$-130.6M-71.4%
Year 1$-134.5M+$6.4M$-128.1M-70.0%
Year 2$-138.6M+$9.6M$-128.9M-70.5%
Year 3$-142.7M+$9.6M$-133.1M-72.7%
Year 4$-147.0M+$9.6M$-137.4M-75.1%
Year 5$-151.4M+$9.6M$-141.8M-77.5%
$-1.31B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.56B
Exit EV (11x)
$-253.6M
Value Created
$-141.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-208.0M
Organic Growth
$96.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-141.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.8M$2.7M$3.7M$4.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.3M
A/R Days Reduction$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M
Clean Claim Rate$59K$88K$117K$140K
Total$4.8M$7.2M$9.6M$11.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 216 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-17.1%-4.5%4.6%
P0
Net-to-Gross12.0%17.6%22.1%28.6%
P8
Occupancy65.4%47.1%60.9%73.2%
P59
Rev/Bed$1.0M$818K$1.4M$2.2M
P32
Exp/Bed$1.7M$926K$1.6M$2.4M
P56

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML