Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SUTTER MATERNITY & SURGERY CENTER 2026-04-26 17:16 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SUTTER MATERNITY & SURGERY CENTER
CCN 050714 | CA | 28 beds | Current EBITDA $11.6M → Pro Forma $16.3M (+$4.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$90.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$11.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$16.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$4.8M
Modeled Uplift
$3.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.2M (vs $4.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$58K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.8M$1.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.7M$50K$1.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$278K$824K$1.1M$3.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$58K$58K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT56.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$453K$905K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$448K$896K$1.3M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$367K$735K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$29K$58K$58K$58K$58K$58K$58K
Cumulative$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x
9.0x47% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
10.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
11.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x
12.0x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.3x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$11.6M$11.6M12.8%
Year 1$11.9M+$3.2M$15.1M16.7%
Year 2$12.3M+$4.8M$17.0M18.8%
Year 3$12.7M+$4.8M$17.4M19.2%
Year 4$13.0M+$4.8M$17.8M19.7%
Year 5$13.4M+$4.8M$18.2M20.1%
$115.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$200.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$84.3M
Value Created
$18.2M
Exit EBITDA
$18.4M
Organic Growth
$47.6M
RCM Value Creation
$18.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$905K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$896K$1.3M$1.8M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$551K$826K$1.1M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$29K$43K$58K$70K
Total$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$5.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 73 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.8%-17.4%-6.1%1.9%
P93
Net-to-Gross35.9%28.0%37.0%56.5%
P46
Occupancy37.5%29.9%44.0%67.0%
P41
Rev/Bed$3.2M$620K$1.7M$3.1M
P75
Exp/Bed$2.8M$754K$1.9M$3.2M
P66

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML