Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SOUTHWEST HEALTHCARE SYSTEM 2026-04-26 06:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SOUTHWEST HEALTHCARE SYSTEM
CCN 050701 | CA | 240 beds | Current EBITDA $20.3M → Pro Forma $40.2M (+$19.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$377.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$20.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$19.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$40.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$19.9M
Modeled Uplift
$14.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.4M (vs $19.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$242K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$19.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.6M$7.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.3M$208K$7.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.4M$4.6M$14.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$242K$242K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.7M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.9M$3.7M$5.6M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.5M$3.1M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$121K$242K$242K$242K$242K$242K$242K
Cumulative$0$5.4M$10.8M$16.1M$19.9M$19.9M$19.9M$19.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $19.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x65% / 12.4x70% / 14.1x74% / 15.9x76% / 16.7x77% / 17.6x
9.0x60% / 10.7x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.5x73% / 15.3x
10.0x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.7x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x
11.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.4x60% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x
12.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x60% / 10.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.2x
Headroom (turns)
34%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 34% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.3x, adding 4.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$20.3M$20.3M5.4%
Year 1$20.9M+$13.3M$34.2M9.0%
Year 2$21.5M+$19.9M$41.4M11.0%
Year 3$22.2M+$19.9M$42.1M11.1%
Year 4$22.9M+$19.9M$42.7M11.3%
Year 5$23.5M+$19.9M$43.4M11.5%
$203.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$477.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$274.6M
Value Created
$43.4M
Exit EBITDA
$32.3M
Organic Growth
$198.8M
RCM Value Creation
$43.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.8M$5.7M$7.6M$9.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.7M$5.6M$7.5M$9.0M
A/R Days Reduction$2.3M$3.4M$4.6M$5.5M
Clean Claim Rate$121K$181K$242K$290K
Total$9.9M$14.9M$19.9M$23.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 195 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.4%-15.6%-3.7%4.8%
P76
Net-to-Gross16.5%17.1%22.3%28.9%
P22
Occupancy79.3%52.9%65.4%75.9%
P78
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.1M$1.6M$2.5M
P49
Exp/Bed$1.5M$1.2M$1.8M$2.6M
P35

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML