Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 02:16 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050625 | CA | 908 beds | Current EBITDA $-216.5M → Pro Forma $-10.2M (+$206.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$3.92B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-216.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$206.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-10.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$150.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$206.4M
Modeled Uplift
$151.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$54.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $151.5M (vs $206.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$78.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$77.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$47.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$2.5M
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$206.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$78.5M$78.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$75.5M$2.2M$77.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$12.0M$35.7M$47.7M$150.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$2.5M$2.5M$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$19.6M$39.2M$58.8M$78.5M$78.5M$78.5M$78.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$19.4M$38.8M$58.3M$77.7M$77.7M$77.7M$77.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$15.9M$31.8M$47.7M$47.7M$47.7M$47.7M$47.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$1.3M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
Cumulative$0$56.2M$112.4M$167.3M$206.4M$206.4M$206.4M$206.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $206.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-216.5M$-216.5M-5.5%
Year 1$-223.0M+$137.6M$-85.5M-2.2%
Year 2$-229.7M+$206.4M$-23.4M-0.6%
Year 3$-236.6M+$206.4M$-30.3M-0.8%
Year 4$-243.7M+$206.4M$-37.4M-1.0%
Year 5$-251.0M+$206.4M$-44.7M-1.1%
$-2.17B
Entry EV (10x)
$-491.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$1.67B
Value Created
$-44.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-344.9M
Organic Growth
$2.06B
RCM Value Creation
$-44.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$39.2M$58.8M$78.5M$94.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$38.8M$58.3M$77.7M$93.2M
A/R Days Reduction$23.9M$35.8M$47.7M$57.3M
Clean Claim Rate$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M
Total$103.2M$154.8M$206.4M$247.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 23 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-5.5%-9.3%-1.9%6.0%
P32
Net-to-Gross15.1%20.0%26.3%30.4%
P9
Occupancy92.2%58.3%69.0%84.9%
P91
Rev/Bed$4.3M$1.6M$2.2M$3.3M
P82
Exp/Bed$4.6M$1.6M$2.1M$3.5M
P78

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML