Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — EISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — EISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050573 | CA | 362 beds | Current EBITDA $-122.0M → Pro Forma $-67.5M (+$54.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.04B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-122.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$54.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-67.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$39.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$54.5M
Modeled Uplift
$38.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$16.4M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $38.1M (vs $54.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$20.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$20.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$12.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$663K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$54.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$20.7M$20.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$20.0M$570K$20.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.2M$9.4M$12.6M$39.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$663K$663K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$5.2M$10.4M$15.5M$20.7M$20.7M$20.7M$20.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$5.1M$10.3M$15.4M$20.5M$20.5M$20.5M$20.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$4.2M$8.4M$12.6M$12.6M$12.6M$12.6M$12.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$332K$663K$663K$663K$663K$663K$663K
Cumulative$0$14.9M$29.7M$44.2M$54.5M$54.5M$54.5M$54.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $54.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-122.0M$-122.0M-11.8%
Year 1$-125.7M+$36.4M$-89.3M-8.6%
Year 2$-129.4M+$54.5M$-74.9M-7.2%
Year 3$-133.3M+$54.5M$-78.8M-7.6%
Year 4$-137.3M+$54.5M$-82.8M-8.0%
Year 5$-141.4M+$54.5M$-86.9M-8.4%
$-1.22B
Entry EV (10x)
$-955.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$264.1M
Value Created
$-86.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-194.3M
Organic Growth
$545.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-86.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$10.4M$15.5M$20.7M$24.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$10.3M$15.4M$20.5M$24.6M
A/R Days Reduction$6.3M$9.5M$12.6M$15.1M
Clean Claim Rate$332K$498K$663K$796K
Total$27.3M$40.9M$54.5M$65.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 156 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-11.8%-15.8%-4.4%3.5%
P32
Net-to-Gross20.2%17.6%22.7%28.9%
P37
Occupancy61.5%54.3%65.4%74.2%
P41
Rev/Bed$2.9M$1.3M$1.9M$2.7M
P78
Exp/Bed$3.2M$1.5M$2.0M$2.8M
P85

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML