Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FOUNTAIN VALLEY REG MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FOUNTAIN VALLEY REG MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050570 | CA | 400 beds | Current EBITDA $-36.6M → Pro Forma $-20.7M (+$16.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$303.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-36.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$16.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-20.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$16.0M
Modeled Uplift
$10.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.7M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.3M (vs $16.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$194K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$16.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.1M$6.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.8M$167K$6.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$931K$2.8M$3.7M$11.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$194K$194K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.6M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.5M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$97K$194K$194K$194K$194K$194K$194K
Cumulative$0$4.3M$8.7M$12.9M$16.0M$16.0M$16.0M$16.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $16.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-36.6M$-36.6M-12.1%
Year 1$-37.7M+$10.6M$-27.1M-8.9%
Year 2$-38.9M+$16.0M$-22.9M-7.5%
Year 3$-40.0M+$16.0M$-24.1M-7.9%
Year 4$-41.2M+$16.0M$-25.3M-8.3%
Year 5$-42.5M+$16.0M$-26.5M-8.7%
$-366.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-291.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$74.8M
Value Created
$-26.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-58.3M
Organic Growth
$159.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-26.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.0M$4.6M$6.1M$7.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.2M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.8M$3.7M$4.4M
Clean Claim Rate$97K$146K$194K$233K
Total$8.0M$12.0M$16.0M$19.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 146 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-12.1%-15.6%-4.4%3.7%
P31
Net-to-Gross9.6%18.1%23.5%28.9%
P3
Occupancy52.5%54.8%65.8%75.3%
P20
Rev/Bed$759K$1.4M$1.9M$2.7M
P7
Exp/Bed$850K$1.5M$2.0M$2.8M
P7

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML