Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KFH - WEST LOS ANGELES 2026-04-26 09:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KFH - WEST LOS ANGELES
CCN 050561 | CA | 265 beds | Current EBITDA $4.6M → Pro Forma $29.9M (+$25.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$482.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$25.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$29.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$18.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$25.4M
Modeled Uplift
$16.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$9.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $16.4M (vs $25.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$309K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$25.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.7M$9.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$9.3M$265K$9.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.5M$4.4M$5.9M$18.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$309K$309K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.4M$4.8M$7.2M$9.7M$9.7M$9.7M$9.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.4M$4.8M$7.2M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.0M$3.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$154K$309K$309K$309K$309K$309K$309K
Cumulative$0$6.9M$13.8M$20.6M$25.4M$25.4M$25.4M$25.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $25.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x115% / 46.0x120% / 51.5x124% / 56.9x127% / 59.7x129% / 62.4x
9.0x110% / 40.5x114% / 45.4x119% / 50.2x121% / 52.7x123% / 55.1x
10.0x105% / 36.1x110% / 40.5x114% / 44.9x116% / 47.1x118% / 49.3x
11.0x101% / 32.6x105% / 36.5x110% / 40.5x112% / 42.5x114% / 44.5x
12.0x97% / 29.6x102% / 33.2x106% / 36.9x108% / 38.7x110% / 40.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.2x
Headroom (turns)
80%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 80% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.3x, adding 7.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.6M$4.6M0.9%
Year 1$4.7M+$16.9M$21.6M4.5%
Year 2$4.8M+$25.4M$30.2M6.3%
Year 3$5.0M+$25.4M$30.4M6.3%
Year 4$5.1M+$25.4M$30.5M6.3%
Year 5$5.3M+$25.4M$30.7M6.4%
$45.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$337.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$291.8M
Value Created
$30.7M
Exit EBITDA
$7.3M
Organic Growth
$253.9M
RCM Value Creation
$30.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.8M$7.2M$9.7M$11.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.8M$7.2M$9.6M$11.5M
A/R Days Reduction$2.9M$4.4M$5.9M$7.0M
Clean Claim Rate$154K$232K$309K$371K
Total$12.7M$19.0M$25.4M$30.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 191 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.9%-14.7%-3.9%4.7%
P66
Net-to-Gross25.8%17.1%22.3%28.9%
P64
Occupancy42.2%53.7%65.4%75.9%
P9
Rev/Bed$1.8M$1.2M$1.7M$2.5M
P54
Exp/Bed$1.8M$1.3M$1.8M$2.6M
P50

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML