Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — COLLEGE HOSPITAL COSTA MESA 2026-04-26 09:35 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — COLLEGE HOSPITAL COSTA MESA
CCN 050543 | CA | 122 beds | Current EBITDA $21.6M → Pro Forma $26.9M (+$5.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$101.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$21.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$26.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$5.3M
Modeled Uplift
$4.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.0M (vs $5.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$65K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.0M$2.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.9M$56K$2.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$310K$921K$1.2M$3.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$65K$65K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$506K$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$501K$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$410K$821K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$32K$65K$65K$65K$65K$65K$65K
Cumulative$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x
9.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
10.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x50% / 7.7x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.1x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$21.6M$21.6M21.4%
Year 1$22.3M+$3.5M$25.8M25.5%
Year 2$22.9M+$5.3M$28.2M27.9%
Year 3$23.6M+$5.3M$28.9M28.6%
Year 4$24.3M+$5.3M$29.6M29.3%
Year 5$25.0M+$5.3M$30.4M30.0%
$216.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$334.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$118.0M
Value Created
$30.4M
Exit EBITDA
$34.4M
Organic Growth
$53.2M
RCM Value Creation
$30.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction$616K$923K$1.2M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$32K$49K$65K$78K
Total$2.7M$4.0M$5.3M$6.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 192 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin21.4%-20.3%-4.5%4.6%
P94
Net-to-Gross99.9%18.1%22.9%30.5%
P99
Occupancy90.3%44.7%58.0%72.5%
P93
Rev/Bed$829K$612K$1.1M$2.1M
P38
Exp/Bed$652K$660K$1.3M$2.4M
P24

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML