Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SUTTER DAVIS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 17:19 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SUTTER DAVIS HOSPITAL
CCN 050537 | CA | 48 beds | Current EBITDA $22.2M → Pro Forma $31.5M (+$9.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$176.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$22.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$9.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$31.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$6.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$9.3M
Modeled Uplift
$7.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.0M (vs $9.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$113K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$9.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.5M$3.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.4M$97K$3.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$543K$1.6M$2.2M$6.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$113K$113K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$885K$1.8M$2.7M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$876K$1.8M$2.6M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$718K$1.4M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$57K$113K$113K$113K$113K$113K$113K
Cumulative$0$2.5M$5.1M$7.5M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $9.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.2x
9.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.4x
10.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x54% / 8.6x55% / 9.1x
11.0x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x
12.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$22.2M$22.2M12.5%
Year 1$22.8M+$6.2M$29.1M16.4%
Year 2$23.5M+$9.3M$32.8M18.6%
Year 3$24.2M+$9.3M$33.5M19.0%
Year 4$25.0M+$9.3M$34.3M19.4%
Year 5$25.7M+$9.3M$35.0M19.8%
$221.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$385.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$163.4M
Value Created
$35.0M
Exit EBITDA
$35.3M
Organic Growth
$93.1M
RCM Value Creation
$35.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.8M$2.7M$3.5M$4.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.8M$2.6M$3.5M$4.2M
A/R Days Reduction$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M
Clean Claim Rate$57K$85K$113K$136K
Total$4.7M$7.0M$9.3M$11.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 105 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.5%-17.6%-5.1%1.8%
P91
Net-to-Gross30.5%23.1%30.5%46.4%
P49
Occupancy71.5%37.5%56.3%71.5%
P74
Rev/Bed$3.7M$503K$1.1M$2.6M
P88
Exp/Bed$3.2M$575K$1.3M$2.8M
P83

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML