Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — EDEN MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — EDEN MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050488 | CA | 126 beds | Current EBITDA $10.5M → Pro Forma $31.0M (+$20.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$389.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$10.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$20.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$31.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$15.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

79%
Realization (B)
$20.5M
Modeled Uplift
$16.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 79% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $16.1M (vs $20.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$249K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$20.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.8M$7.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.5M$214K$7.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.5M$4.7M$15.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$249K$249K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.9M$3.9M$5.8M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.9M$3.9M$5.8M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$125K$249K$249K$249K$249K$249K$249K
Cumulative$0$5.6M$11.2M$16.6M$20.5M$20.5M$20.5M$20.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $20.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x81% / 19.6x86% / 22.1x90% / 24.6x92% / 25.9x94% / 27.2x
9.0x76% / 17.0x81% / 19.3x85% / 21.5x87% / 22.7x88% / 23.8x
10.0x72% / 15.0x76% / 17.0x80% / 19.1x82% / 20.1x84% / 21.1x
11.0x68% / 13.3x72% / 15.2x76% / 17.0x78% / 17.9x80% / 18.9x
12.0x64% / 12.0x69% / 13.7x73% / 15.3x74% / 16.2x76% / 17.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.6x
Headroom (turns)
56%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 56% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.9x, adding 5.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$10.5M$10.5M2.7%
Year 1$10.8M+$13.7M$24.4M6.3%
Year 2$11.1M+$20.5M$31.6M8.1%
Year 3$11.4M+$20.5M$31.9M8.2%
Year 4$11.8M+$20.5M$32.3M8.3%
Year 5$12.1M+$20.5M$32.6M8.4%
$104.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$359.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$254.4M
Value Created
$32.6M
Exit EBITDA
$16.7M
Organic Growth
$205.1M
RCM Value Creation
$32.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.9M$5.8M$7.8M$9.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.9M$5.8M$7.7M$9.3M
A/R Days Reduction$2.4M$3.6M$4.7M$5.7M
Clean Claim Rate$125K$187K$249K$299K
Total$10.3M$15.4M$20.5M$24.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 193 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.7%-20.2%-4.3%4.8%
P69
Net-to-Gross29.2%17.9%22.7%30.0%
P72
Occupancy95.6%44.8%57.9%72.2%
P98
Rev/Bed$3.1M$617K$1.1M$2.1M
P94
Exp/Bed$3.0M$676K$1.3M$2.4M
P91

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML