Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DOCTORS MEDICAL CENTER OF MODESTO 2026-04-26 12:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DOCTORS MEDICAL CENTER OF MODESTO
CCN 050464 | CA | 380 beds | Current EBITDA $16.2M → Pro Forma $51.6M (+$35.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$672.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$16.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$35.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$51.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$25.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$35.4M
Modeled Uplift
$25.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$9.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $25.9M (vs $35.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$13.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$13.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$431K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$35.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$13.5M$13.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$13.0M$370K$13.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.1M$6.1M$8.2M$25.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$431K$431K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.4M$6.7M$10.1M$13.5M$13.5M$13.5M$13.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.3M$6.7M$10.0M$13.3M$13.3M$13.3M$13.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.7M$5.5M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$215K$431K$431K$431K$431K$431K$431K
Cumulative$0$9.6M$19.3M$28.7M$35.4M$35.4M$35.4M$35.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $35.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x84% / 21.2x89% / 23.9x93% / 26.7x95% / 28.0x97% / 29.4x
9.0x79% / 18.5x84% / 20.9x88% / 23.3x90% / 24.6x92% / 25.8x
10.0x75% / 16.3x79% / 18.5x83% / 20.7x85% / 21.8x87% / 22.9x
11.0x71% / 14.6x75% / 16.5x79% / 18.5x81% / 19.5x83% / 20.5x
12.0x67% / 13.1x72% / 14.9x76% / 16.7x77% / 17.6x79% / 18.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.8x
Headroom (turns)
59%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 59% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.7x, adding 5.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$16.2M$16.2M2.4%
Year 1$16.7M+$23.6M$40.3M6.0%
Year 2$17.2M+$35.4M$52.6M7.8%
Year 3$17.7M+$35.4M$53.1M7.9%
Year 4$18.2M+$35.4M$53.6M8.0%
Year 5$18.8M+$35.4M$54.1M8.0%
$161.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$595.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$433.8M
Value Created
$54.1M
Exit EBITDA
$25.8M
Organic Growth
$353.9M
RCM Value Creation
$54.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.7M$10.1M$13.5M$16.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.7M$10.0M$13.3M$16.0M
A/R Days Reduction$4.1M$6.1M$8.2M$9.8M
Clean Claim Rate$215K$323K$431K$517K
Total$17.7M$26.5M$35.4M$42.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 148 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.4%-15.8%-4.4%3.8%
P70
Net-to-Gross8.3%17.8%23.1%28.9%
P1
Occupancy85.5%54.8%65.7%75.3%
P91
Rev/Bed$1.8M$1.3M$1.9M$2.7M
P45
Exp/Bed$1.7M$1.5M$2.0M$2.8M
P39

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML