Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WEST ANAHEIM MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WEST ANAHEIM MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050426 | CA | 167 beds | Current EBITDA $17.2M → Pro Forma $25.1M (+$7.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$148.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$17.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$25.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$7.8M
Modeled Uplift
$5.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.1M (vs $7.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$95K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.0M$3.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.9M$82K$2.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$456K$1.4M$1.8M$5.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$95K$95K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$743K$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$735K$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$602K$1.2M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$48K$95K$95K$95K$95K$95K$95K
Cumulative$0$2.1M$4.3M$6.3M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x
9.0x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x
10.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
11.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
12.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$17.2M$17.2M11.6%
Year 1$17.8M+$5.2M$23.0M15.5%
Year 2$18.3M+$7.8M$26.1M17.6%
Year 3$18.8M+$7.8M$26.7M18.0%
Year 4$19.4M+$7.8M$27.2M18.3%
Year 5$20.0M+$7.8M$27.8M18.7%
$172.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$305.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$133.4M
Value Created
$27.8M
Exit EBITDA
$27.5M
Organic Growth
$78.1M
RCM Value Creation
$27.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M
A/R Days Reduction$904K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
Clean Claim Rate$48K$71K$95K$114K
Total$3.9M$5.9M$7.8M$9.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 210 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.6%-17.3%-4.5%3.7%
P89
Net-to-Gross26.0%18.0%22.3%29.2%
P64
Occupancy47.1%46.6%60.0%72.5%
P26
Rev/Bed$889K$770K$1.4M$2.2M
P30
Exp/Bed$786K$810K$1.6M$2.4M
P24

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML