Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SCRIPPS GREEN HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SCRIPPS GREEN HOSPITAL
CCN 050424 | CA | 150 beds | Current EBITDA $57.3M → Pro Forma $78.5M (+$21.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$403.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$57.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$21.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$78.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$15.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$21.2M
Modeled Uplift
$15.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $15.1M (vs $21.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$258K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$21.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.1M$8.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.8M$222K$8.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.7M$4.9M$15.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$258K$258K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.0M$4.0M$6.0M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.0M$4.0M$6.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.6M$3.3M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$129K$258K$258K$258K$258K$258K$258K
Cumulative$0$5.8M$11.6M$17.2M$21.2M$21.2M$21.2M$21.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $21.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.7x
9.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x59% / 10.0x
10.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
11.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x
12.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.3x
Headroom (turns)
5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.2x, adding 2.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$57.3M$57.3M14.2%
Year 1$59.0M+$14.1M$73.2M18.1%
Year 2$60.8M+$21.2M$82.0M20.3%
Year 3$62.6M+$21.2M$83.8M20.8%
Year 4$64.5M+$21.2M$85.7M21.3%
Year 5$66.4M+$21.2M$87.6M21.7%
$573.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$964.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$391.0M
Value Created
$87.6M
Exit EBITDA
$91.3M
Organic Growth
$212.1M
RCM Value Creation
$87.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.0M$6.0M$8.1M$9.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.0M$6.0M$8.0M$9.6M
A/R Days Reduction$2.5M$3.7M$4.9M$5.9M
Clean Claim Rate$129K$194K$258K$310K
Total$10.6M$15.9M$21.2M$25.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 198 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin14.2%-16.9%-3.9%4.5%
P92
Net-to-Gross19.3%18.2%22.3%28.9%
P29
Occupancy60.0%45.7%59.3%72.5%
P51
Rev/Bed$2.7M$706K$1.4M$2.2M
P84
Exp/Bed$2.3M$752K$1.5M$2.4M
P71

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML