Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — COALINGA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — COALINGA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050397 | CA | 22 beds | Current EBITDA $146K → Pro Forma $258K (+$112K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$146K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$112K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$258K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+612bps
Margin Improvement
$70K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$112K
Modeled Uplift
$66K
Risk-Adjusted
-$46K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.1M (vs $0.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$43K
+238bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$37K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$22K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+53bp
Total EBITDA Impact$112K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$35K$8K$43K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$37K$37K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$6K$17K$22K$70K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT62.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$11K$22K$33K$43K$43K$43K$43K
Cost to Collect$0$9K$18K$27K$37K$37K$37K$37K
A/R Days Reduction$0$7K$15K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$32K$64K$92K$112K$112K$112K$112K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $112K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.4x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.5x
9.0x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.7x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x
10.0x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.8x
11.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
12.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.7x
Headroom (turns)
26%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 26% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.8x, adding 3.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$146K$146K8.0%
Year 1$151K+$75K$225K12.3%
Year 2$155K+$112K$267K14.6%
Year 3$160K+$112K$272K14.9%
Year 4$165K+$112K$276K15.1%
Year 5$170K+$112K$281K15.4%
$1.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$3.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$1.6M
Value Created
$281K
Exit EBITDA
$233K
Organic Growth
$1.1M
RCM Value Creation
$281K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$22K$33K$43K$52K
Cost to Collect$18K$27K$37K$44K
A/R Days Reduction$11K$17K$22K$27K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$56K$84K$112K$134K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 61 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-20.5%-9.9%-0.1%
P0
Net-to-Gross64.4%30.5%42.3%62.1%
P79
Occupancy16.5%24.1%37.5%67.0%
P13
Rev/Bed$83K$979K$2.2M$3.2M
P2
Exp/Bed$351K$1.0M$2.1M$3.4M
P3

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML