Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL
CCN 050380 | CA | 324 beds | Current EBITDA $128.9M → Pro Forma $161.4M (+$32.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$618.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$128.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$32.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$161.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$23.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$32.5M
Modeled Uplift
$22.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$10.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $22.5M (vs $32.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$12.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$12.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$396K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$32.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$12.4M$12.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$11.9M$340K$12.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.9M$5.6M$7.5M$23.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$396K$396K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.1M$6.2M$9.3M$12.4M$12.4M$12.4M$12.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.1M$6.1M$9.2M$12.2M$12.2M$12.2M$12.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.5M$5.0M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$198K$396K$396K$396K$396K$396K$396K
Cumulative$0$8.9M$17.7M$26.4M$32.5M$32.5M$32.5M$32.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $32.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x
9.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 7.0x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
10.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x
11.0x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.1x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$128.9M$128.9M20.8%
Year 1$132.7M+$21.7M$154.4M25.0%
Year 2$136.7M+$32.5M$169.2M27.4%
Year 3$140.8M+$32.5M$173.3M28.0%
Year 4$145.0M+$32.5M$177.6M28.7%
Year 5$149.4M+$32.5M$181.9M29.4%
$1.29B
Entry EV (10x)
$2.00B
Exit EV (11x)
$712.5M
Value Created
$181.9M
Exit EBITDA
$205.2M
Organic Growth
$325.4M
RCM Value Creation
$181.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.2M$9.3M$12.4M$14.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.1M$9.2M$12.2M$14.7M
A/R Days Reduction$3.8M$5.6M$7.5M$9.0M
Clean Claim Rate$198K$297K$396K$475K
Total$16.3M$24.4M$32.5M$39.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 167 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin20.8%-15.0%-3.6%4.5%
P96
Net-to-Gross10.7%17.3%22.6%28.9%
P6
Occupancy62.4%53.7%65.4%75.3%
P44
Rev/Bed$1.9M$1.3M$1.7M$2.5M
P56
Exp/Bed$1.5M$1.3M$1.9M$2.6M
P32

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML