Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TORRANCE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TORRANCE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050351 | CA | 493 beds | Current EBITDA $638K → Pro Forma $42.2M (+$41.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$790.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$638K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$41.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$42.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$30.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$41.6M
Modeled Uplift
$28.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$13.4M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $28.2M (vs $41.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$15.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$15.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$9.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$506K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$41.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$15.8M$15.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$15.2M$435K$15.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.4M$7.2M$9.6M$30.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$506K$506K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$4.0M$7.9M$11.9M$15.8M$15.8M$15.8M$15.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.9M$7.8M$11.7M$15.7M$15.7M$15.7M$15.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.2M$6.4M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$253K$506K$506K$506K$506K$506K$506K
Cumulative$0$11.3M$22.7M$33.7M$41.6M$41.6M$41.6M$41.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $41.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x244% / 482.0x251% / 535.9x258% / 589.9x261% / 616.8x265% / 643.8x
9.0x236% / 428.1x243% / 476.0x250% / 524.0x253% / 547.9x256% / 571.9x
10.0x229% / 385.0x236% / 428.1x242% / 471.2x246% / 492.8x249% / 514.4x
11.0x223% / 349.7x230% / 388.9x236% / 428.1x239% / 447.7x242% / 467.3x
12.0x217% / 320.3x224% / 356.2x230% / 392.1x233% / 410.1x236% / 428.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.4x
Headroom (turns)
98%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 98% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.1x, adding 8.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$638K$638K0.1%
Year 1$657K+$27.7M$28.4M3.6%
Year 2$677K+$41.6M$42.3M5.3%
Year 3$697K+$41.6M$42.3M5.3%
Year 4$718K+$41.6M$42.3M5.4%
Year 5$739K+$41.6M$42.3M5.4%
$6.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$465.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$459.3M
Value Created
$42.3M
Exit EBITDA
$1.0M
Organic Growth
$415.9M
RCM Value Creation
$42.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$7.9M$11.9M$15.8M$19.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.8M$11.7M$15.7M$18.8M
A/R Days Reduction$4.8M$7.2M$9.6M$11.5M
Clean Claim Rate$253K$379K$506K$607K
Total$20.8M$31.2M$41.6M$49.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 109 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.1%-14.7%-5.4%3.0%
P65
Net-to-Gross14.7%17.9%23.8%28.9%
P10
Occupancy67.2%57.3%68.9%77.4%
P46
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.5M$1.9M$2.8M
P34
Exp/Bed$1.6M$1.6M$2.0M$2.9M
P24

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML