Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CORONA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CORONA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050329 | CA | 160 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.1M → Pro Forma $8.6M (+$11.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$223.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$11.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$8.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$11.7M
Modeled Uplift
$8.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $8.3M (vs $11.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$143K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$11.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.5M$4.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.3M$123K$4.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$685K$2.0M$2.7M$8.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$143K$143K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$905K$1.8M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$71K$143K$143K$143K$143K$143K$143K
Cumulative$0$3.2M$6.4M$9.5M$11.7M$11.7M$11.7M$11.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $11.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-3.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
9.6x
Headroom (turns)
148%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 148% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -3.1x, adding 102.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.1M$-3.1M-1.4%
Year 1$-3.2M+$7.8M$4.6M2.1%
Year 2$-3.3M+$11.7M$8.4M3.8%
Year 3$-3.4M+$11.7M$8.3M3.7%
Year 4$-3.5M+$11.7M$8.2M3.7%
Year 5$-3.6M+$11.7M$8.1M3.6%
$-31.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$89.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$120.5M
Value Created
$8.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-5.0M
Organic Growth
$117.4M
RCM Value Creation
$8.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.2M$3.3M$4.5M$5.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$5.3M
A/R Days Reduction$1.4M$2.0M$2.7M$3.3M
Clean Claim Rate$71K$107K$143K$171K
Total$5.9M$8.8M$11.7M$14.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 210 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.4%-16.9%-4.3%4.4%
P60
Net-to-Gross13.8%18.1%22.3%29.2%
P10
Occupancy66.0%46.1%59.3%72.6%
P61
Rev/Bed$1.4M$722K$1.4M$2.2M
P51
Exp/Bed$1.4M$782K$1.5M$2.4M
P45

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML