Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SCRIPPS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL - LA JOLLA 2026-04-26 06:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SCRIPPS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL - LA JOLLA
CCN 050324 | CA | 365 beds | Current EBITDA $94.0M → Pro Forma $140.5M (+$46.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$884.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$94.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$46.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$140.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$33.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$46.6M
Modeled Uplift
$34.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$12.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $34.4M (vs $46.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$17.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$17.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$10.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$566K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$46.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$17.7M$17.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$17.0M$487K$17.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.7M$8.1M$10.8M$33.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$566K$566K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$4.4M$8.8M$13.3M$17.7M$17.7M$17.7M$17.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$4.4M$8.8M$13.1M$17.5M$17.5M$17.5M$17.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.6M$7.2M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$283K$566K$566K$566K$566K$566K$566K
Cumulative$0$12.7M$25.4M$37.8M$46.6M$46.6M$46.6M$46.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $46.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x
9.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
10.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x
11.0x41% / 5.5x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x
12.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.8x
Headroom (turns)
13%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 13% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.7x, adding 2.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$94.0M$94.0M10.6%
Year 1$96.8M+$31.0M$127.8M14.4%
Year 2$99.7M+$46.6M$146.3M16.5%
Year 3$102.7M+$46.6M$149.2M16.9%
Year 4$105.8M+$46.6M$152.3M17.2%
Year 5$108.9M+$46.6M$155.5M17.6%
$939.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.71B
Exit EV (11x)
$770.7M
Value Created
$155.5M
Exit EBITDA
$149.7M
Organic Growth
$465.6M
RCM Value Creation
$155.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$8.8M$13.3M$17.7M$21.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$8.8M$13.1M$17.5M$21.0M
A/R Days Reduction$5.4M$8.1M$10.8M$12.9M
Clean Claim Rate$283K$425K$566K$680K
Total$23.3M$34.9M$46.6M$55.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 155 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.6%-15.5%-4.3%3.5%
P88
Net-to-Gross18.9%17.7%22.8%28.9%
P30
Occupancy85.4%54.3%65.4%74.6%
P90
Rev/Bed$2.4M$1.3M$1.9M$2.7M
P70
Exp/Bed$2.2M$1.5M$2.0M$2.8M
P60

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML