Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050309 | CA | 318 beds | Current EBITDA $129.4M → Pro Forma $185.7M (+$56.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.07B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$129.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$56.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$185.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$41.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

77%
Realization (B)
$56.3M
Modeled Uplift
$43.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$12.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 77% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $43.3M (vs $56.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$21.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$21.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$13.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$685K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$56.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$21.4M$21.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$20.6M$588K$21.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.3M$9.7M$13.0M$41.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$685K$685K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$5.3M$10.7M$16.0M$21.4M$21.4M$21.4M$21.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$5.3M$10.6M$15.9M$21.2M$21.2M$21.2M$21.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$4.3M$8.7M$13.0M$13.0M$13.0M$13.0M$13.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$342K$685K$685K$685K$685K$685K$685K
Cumulative$0$15.3M$30.7M$45.6M$56.3M$56.3M$56.3M$56.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $56.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.4x58% / 9.7x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.7x65% / 12.3x
9.0x48% / 7.1x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
10.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
11.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x
12.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.6x
Headroom (turns)
9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.9x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$129.4M$129.4M12.1%
Year 1$133.3M+$37.5M$170.8M16.0%
Year 2$137.2M+$56.3M$193.5M18.1%
Year 3$141.4M+$56.3M$197.7M18.5%
Year 4$145.6M+$56.3M$201.9M18.9%
Year 5$150.0M+$56.3M$206.3M19.3%
$1.29B
Entry EV (10x)
$2.27B
Exit EV (11x)
$975.2M
Value Created
$206.3M
Exit EBITDA
$206.1M
Organic Growth
$562.9M
RCM Value Creation
$206.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$10.7M$16.0M$21.4M$25.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$10.6M$15.9M$21.2M$25.4M
A/R Days Reduction$6.5M$9.8M$13.0M$15.6M
Clean Claim Rate$342K$514K$685K$822K
Total$28.1M$42.2M$56.3M$67.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 170 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.1%-15.6%-3.8%4.4%
P90
Net-to-Gross29.3%17.2%22.5%28.8%
P79
Occupancy93.1%53.7%65.4%74.9%
P98
Rev/Bed$3.4M$1.2M$1.7M$2.5M
P91
Exp/Bed$3.0M$1.3M$1.8M$2.6M
P84

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML