Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — EL CAMINO HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:50 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — EL CAMINO HOSPITAL
CCN 050308 | CA | 388 beds | Current EBITDA $156.9M → Pro Forma $227.3M (+$70.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.34B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$156.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$70.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$227.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$51.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$70.4M
Modeled Uplift
$50.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$19.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $50.9M (vs $70.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$26.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$26.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$16.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$856K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$70.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$26.8M$26.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$25.8M$736K$26.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$4.1M$12.2M$16.3M$51.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$856K$856K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$6.7M$13.4M$20.1M$26.8M$26.8M$26.8M$26.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$6.6M$13.2M$19.9M$26.5M$26.5M$26.5M$26.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$5.4M$10.9M$16.3M$16.3M$16.3M$16.3M$16.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$428K$856K$856K$856K$856K$856K$856K
Cumulative$0$19.2M$38.3M$57.1M$70.4M$70.4M$70.4M$70.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $70.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.4x
9.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x
10.0x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
11.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
12.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$156.9M$156.9M11.7%
Year 1$161.6M+$46.9M$208.6M15.6%
Year 2$166.5M+$70.4M$236.9M17.7%
Year 3$171.5M+$70.4M$241.9M18.1%
Year 4$176.6M+$70.4M$247.0M18.5%
Year 5$181.9M+$70.4M$252.3M18.9%
$1.57B
Entry EV (10x)
$2.78B
Exit EV (11x)
$1.21B
Value Created
$252.3M
Exit EBITDA
$250.0M
Organic Growth
$704.0M
RCM Value Creation
$252.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$13.4M$20.1M$26.8M$32.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$13.2M$19.9M$26.5M$31.8M
A/R Days Reduction$8.1M$12.2M$16.3M$19.5M
Clean Claim Rate$428K$642K$856K$1.0M
Total$35.2M$52.8M$70.4M$84.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 146 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.7%-15.9%-4.4%3.7%
P90
Net-to-Gross23.7%17.9%23.3%28.9%
P51
Occupancy71.5%54.8%65.7%75.3%
P63
Rev/Bed$3.4M$1.4M$1.9M$2.7M
P88
Exp/Bed$3.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.8M
P82

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML