Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MERCY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 11:15 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MERCY HOSPITAL
CCN 050295 | CA | 229 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.6M → Pro Forma $17.0M (+$19.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$371.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$19.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$17.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$19.5M
Modeled Uplift
$13.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.4M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $13.1M (vs $19.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$238K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$19.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.4M$7.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.1M$204K$7.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.4M$4.5M$14.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$238K$238K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.9M$3.7M$5.6M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.8M$3.7M$5.5M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$119K$238K$238K$238K$238K$238K$238K
Cumulative$0$5.3M$10.6M$15.8M$19.5M$19.5M$19.5M$19.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $19.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-1.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
7.8x
Headroom (turns)
120%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 120% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -1.3x, adding 100.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.6M$-2.6M-0.7%
Year 1$-2.7M+$13.0M$10.4M2.8%
Year 2$-2.7M+$19.5M$16.8M4.5%
Year 3$-2.8M+$19.5M$16.7M4.5%
Year 4$-2.9M+$19.5M$16.6M4.5%
Year 5$-3.0M+$19.5M$16.5M4.5%
$-25.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$182.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$207.7M
Value Created
$16.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-4.1M
Organic Growth
$195.3M
RCM Value Creation
$16.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.7M$5.6M$7.4M$8.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.7M$5.5M$7.4M$8.8M
A/R Days Reduction$2.3M$3.4M$4.5M$5.4M
Clean Claim Rate$119K$178K$238K$285K
Total$9.8M$14.6M$19.5M$23.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 200 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.7%-16.7%-3.9%4.5%
P62
Net-to-Gross24.3%17.2%22.6%29.0%
P57
Occupancy54.4%50.8%64.2%75.3%
P30
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.1M$1.6M$2.5M
P50
Exp/Bed$1.6M$1.2M$1.8M$2.6M
P42

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML