Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — RIVERSIDE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM 2026-04-26 06:25 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — RIVERSIDE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM
CCN 050292 | CA | 423 beds | Current EBITDA $-94.2M → Pro Forma $-46.0M (+$48.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$917.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-94.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$48.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-46.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$35.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$48.3M
Modeled Uplift
$35.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$12.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $35.7M (vs $48.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$18.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$18.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$11.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$587K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$48.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$18.3M$18.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$17.7M$505K$18.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.8M$8.3M$11.2M$35.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$587K$587K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$4.6M$9.2M$13.8M$18.3M$18.3M$18.3M$18.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$4.5M$9.1M$13.6M$18.2M$18.2M$18.2M$18.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.7M$7.4M$11.2M$11.2M$11.2M$11.2M$11.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$294K$587K$587K$587K$587K$587K$587K
Cumulative$0$13.1M$26.3M$39.1M$48.3M$48.3M$48.3M$48.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $48.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-94.2M$-94.2M-10.3%
Year 1$-97.0M+$32.2M$-64.9M-7.1%
Year 2$-100.0M+$48.3M$-51.7M-5.6%
Year 3$-103.0M+$48.3M$-54.7M-6.0%
Year 4$-106.0M+$48.3M$-57.8M-6.3%
Year 5$-109.2M+$48.3M$-61.0M-6.6%
$-942.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-670.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$271.6M
Value Created
$-61.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-150.1M
Organic Growth
$482.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-61.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$9.2M$13.8M$18.3M$22.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$9.1M$13.6M$18.2M$21.8M
A/R Days Reduction$5.6M$8.4M$11.2M$13.4M
Clean Claim Rate$294K$440K$587K$705K
Total$24.1M$36.2M$48.3M$57.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 139 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-10.3%-15.0%-4.3%3.9%
P37
Net-to-Gross27.5%18.7%24.1%29.2%
P65
Occupancy91.4%55.4%67.2%76.3%
P95
Rev/Bed$2.2M$1.4M$1.9M$2.8M
P63
Exp/Bed$2.4M$1.5M$2.0M$2.9M
P65

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML