Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PROVIDENCE ST JOHNS HEALTH CENTER 2026-04-26 09:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PROVIDENCE ST JOHNS HEALTH CENTER
CCN 050290 | CA | 228 beds | Current EBITDA $-169.9M → Pro Forma $-147.6M (+$22.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$423.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-169.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$22.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-147.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$16.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$22.3M
Modeled Uplift
$15.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $15.6M (vs $22.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$271K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$22.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.5M$8.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.2M$233K$8.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.3M$3.9M$5.2M$16.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$271K$271K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.4M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.3M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$136K$271K$271K$271K$271K$271K$271K
Cumulative$0$6.1M$12.1M$18.1M$22.3M$22.3M$22.3M$22.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $22.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-169.9M$-169.9M-40.1%
Year 1$-175.0M+$14.9M$-160.1M-37.8%
Year 2$-180.2M+$22.3M$-157.9M-37.3%
Year 3$-185.6M+$22.3M$-163.3M-38.6%
Year 4$-191.2M+$22.3M$-168.9M-39.9%
Year 5$-196.9M+$22.3M$-174.6M-41.2%
$-1.70B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.92B
Exit EV (11x)
$-222.3M
Value Created
$-174.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-270.5M
Organic Growth
$222.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-174.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.2M$6.4M$8.5M$10.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.2M$6.3M$8.4M$10.1M
A/R Days Reduction$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$6.2M
Clean Claim Rate$136K$203K$271K$325K
Total$11.1M$16.7M$22.3M$26.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 201 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-40.1%-16.7%-3.9%4.6%
P5
Net-to-Gross27.2%17.1%22.5%29.0%
P67
Occupancy64.5%50.5%64.0%75.3%
P50
Rev/Bed$1.9M$1.1M$1.6M$2.5M
P58
Exp/Bed$2.6M$1.2M$1.8M$2.6M
P74

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML