Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MERCY MEDICAL CENTER REDDING 2026-04-26 09:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MERCY MEDICAL CENTER REDDING
CCN 050280 | CA | 262 beds | Current EBITDA $20.1M → Pro Forma $51.1M (+$31.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$588.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$20.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$31.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$51.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$22.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$31.0M
Modeled Uplift
$22.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $22.2M (vs $31.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$11.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$11.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$377K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$31.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$11.8M$11.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$11.3M$324K$11.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.8M$5.4M$7.2M$22.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$377K$377K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.9M$5.9M$8.8M$11.8M$11.8M$11.8M$11.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.9M$5.8M$8.7M$11.7M$11.7M$11.7M$11.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.4M$4.8M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$188K$377K$377K$377K$377K$377K$377K
Cumulative$0$8.4M$16.9M$25.1M$31.0M$31.0M$31.0M$31.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $31.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x75% / 16.5x80% / 18.7x84% / 20.9x86% / 22.0x87% / 23.1x
9.0x70% / 14.3x75% / 16.2x79% / 18.2x81% / 19.2x82% / 20.1x
10.0x66% / 12.5x70% / 14.3x74% / 16.1x76% / 16.9x78% / 17.8x
11.0x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.7x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.1x74% / 15.9x
12.0x58% / 9.9x63% / 11.4x67% / 12.8x68% / 13.6x70% / 14.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.2x
Headroom (turns)
49%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 49% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.3x, adding 5.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$20.1M$20.1M3.4%
Year 1$20.7M+$20.6M$41.4M7.0%
Year 2$21.3M+$31.0M$52.3M8.9%
Year 3$22.0M+$31.0M$52.9M9.0%
Year 4$22.6M+$31.0M$53.6M9.1%
Year 5$23.3M+$31.0M$54.3M9.2%
$201.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$597.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$395.9M
Value Created
$54.3M
Exit EBITDA
$32.0M
Organic Growth
$309.6M
RCM Value Creation
$54.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.9M$8.8M$11.8M$14.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.8M$8.7M$11.7M$14.0M
A/R Days Reduction$3.6M$5.4M$7.2M$8.6M
Clean Claim Rate$188K$282K$377K$452K
Total$15.5M$23.2M$31.0M$37.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 191 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.4%-15.1%-3.9%4.5%
P73
Net-to-Gross24.1%17.1%22.3%28.8%
P57
Occupancy70.8%53.7%65.7%75.9%
P60
Rev/Bed$2.2M$1.2M$1.7M$2.5M
P71
Exp/Bed$2.2M$1.3M$1.8M$2.6M
P62

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML