Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HI - DESERT MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HI - DESERT MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050279 | CA | 55 beds | Current EBITDA $3.0M → Pro Forma $7.2M (+$4.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$80.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$4.2M
Modeled Uplift
$2.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.7M (vs $4.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$979K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$51K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.6M$1.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.5M$44K$1.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$247K$732K$979K$3.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$51K$51K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$402K$804K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$398K$796K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$326K$652K$979K$979K$979K$979K$979K
Clean Claim Rate$0$26K$51K$51K$51K$51K$51K$51K
Cumulative$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.4M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x73% / 15.7x78% / 17.8x82% / 19.9x84% / 21.0x86% / 22.0x
9.0x69% / 13.6x73% / 15.5x77% / 17.3x79% / 18.3x81% / 19.2x
10.0x64% / 11.9x69% / 13.6x73% / 15.3x74% / 16.1x76% / 17.0x
11.0x60% / 10.5x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.6x70% / 14.4x72% / 15.1x
12.0x56% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.0x
Headroom (turns)
46%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 46% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.5x, adding 5.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.0M$3.0M3.7%
Year 1$3.0M+$2.8M$5.9M7.3%
Year 2$3.1M+$4.2M$7.4M9.2%
Year 3$3.2M+$4.2M$7.5M9.3%
Year 4$3.3M+$4.2M$7.6M9.4%
Year 5$3.4M+$4.2M$7.7M9.5%
$29.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$84.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$54.7M
Value Created
$7.7M
Exit EBITDA
$4.7M
Organic Growth
$42.3M
RCM Value Creation
$7.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$804K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$796K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$489K$734K$979K$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$26K$39K$51K$62K
Total$2.1M$3.2M$4.2M$5.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 110 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.7%-21.2%-5.7%1.9%
P77
Net-to-Gross15.9%20.3%26.5%39.7%
P12
Occupancy30.4%41.1%56.7%71.5%
P12
Rev/Bed$1.5M$500K$753K$2.1M
P68
Exp/Bed$1.4M$529K$832K$2.0M
P63

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML