Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CONTRA COSTA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CONTRA COSTA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050276 | CA | 124 beds | Current EBITDA $-173.7M → Pro Forma $-142.4M (+$31.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$595.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-173.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$31.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-142.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$22.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$31.3M
Modeled Uplift
$23.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.0M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $23.3M (vs $31.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$11.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$11.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$381K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$31.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$11.9M$11.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$11.5M$327K$11.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.8M$5.4M$7.2M$22.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$381K$381K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.0M$5.9M$8.9M$11.9M$11.9M$11.9M$11.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.9M$5.9M$8.8M$11.8M$11.8M$11.8M$11.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.4M$4.8M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$190K$381K$381K$381K$381K$381K$381K
Cumulative$0$8.5M$17.0M$25.4M$31.3M$31.3M$31.3M$31.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $31.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-173.7M$-173.7M-29.2%
Year 1$-178.9M+$20.9M$-158.0M-26.6%
Year 2$-184.3M+$31.3M$-153.0M-25.7%
Year 3$-189.8M+$31.3M$-158.5M-26.6%
Year 4$-195.5M+$31.3M$-164.2M-27.6%
Year 5$-201.4M+$31.3M$-170.1M-28.6%
$-1.74B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.87B
Exit EV (11x)
$-133.7M
Value Created
$-170.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-276.6M
Organic Growth
$313.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-170.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.9M$8.9M$11.9M$14.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.9M$8.8M$11.8M$14.1M
A/R Days Reduction$3.6M$5.4M$7.2M$8.7M
Clean Claim Rate$190K$286K$381K$457K
Total$15.6M$23.5M$31.3M$37.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 192 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-29.2%-20.3%-4.5%4.6%
P17
Net-to-Gross73.5%18.0%22.8%30.5%
P98
Occupancy70.0%44.7%57.8%72.2%
P67
Rev/Bed$4.8M$616K$1.1M$2.1M
P98
Exp/Bed$6.2M$669K$1.3M$2.4M
P98

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML