Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DESERT HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 08:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DESERT HOSPITAL
CCN 050243 | CA | 324 beds | Current EBITDA $63.2M → Pro Forma $95.3M (+$32.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$610.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$63.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$32.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$95.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$23.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$32.1M
Modeled Uplift
$23.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $23.3M (vs $32.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$12.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$12.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$390K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$32.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$12.2M$12.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$11.7M$336K$12.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.9M$5.6M$7.4M$23.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$390K$390K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.1M$6.1M$9.2M$12.2M$12.2M$12.2M$12.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.0M$6.0M$9.1M$12.1M$12.1M$12.1M$12.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.5M$4.9M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$195K$390K$390K$390K$390K$390K$390K
Cumulative$0$8.7M$17.5M$26.0M$32.1M$32.1M$32.1M$32.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $32.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.3x63% / 11.7x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x
9.0x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.8x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
10.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
11.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
12.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.9x
Headroom (turns)
14%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 14% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.6x, adding 2.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$63.2M$63.2M10.4%
Year 1$65.1M+$21.4M$86.5M14.2%
Year 2$67.0M+$32.1M$99.1M16.2%
Year 3$69.0M+$32.1M$101.1M16.6%
Year 4$71.1M+$32.1M$103.2M16.9%
Year 5$73.2M+$32.1M$105.3M17.3%
$631.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.16B
Exit EV (11x)
$526.9M
Value Created
$105.3M
Exit EBITDA
$100.6M
Organic Growth
$321.0M
RCM Value Creation
$105.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.1M$9.2M$12.2M$14.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.0M$9.1M$12.1M$14.5M
A/R Days Reduction$3.7M$5.6M$7.4M$8.9M
Clean Claim Rate$195K$293K$390K$469K
Total$16.0M$24.1M$32.1M$38.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 167 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.4%-15.0%-3.6%4.5%
P85
Net-to-Gross11.0%17.3%22.6%28.9%
P7
Occupancy79.5%53.7%65.4%75.3%
P83
Rev/Bed$1.9M$1.3M$1.7M$2.5M
P55
Exp/Bed$1.7M$1.3M$1.9M$2.6M
P41

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML