Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ZUCKERBERG SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ZUCKERBERG SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL
CCN 050228 | CA | 284 beds | Current EBITDA $-371.2M → Pro Forma $-324.4M (+$46.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$889.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-371.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$46.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-324.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$34.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$46.8M
Modeled Uplift
$35.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$11.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $35.4M (vs $46.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$17.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$17.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$10.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$569K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$46.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$17.8M$17.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$17.1M$489K$17.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.7M$8.1M$10.8M$34.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$569K$569K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$4.4M$8.9M$13.3M$17.8M$17.8M$17.8M$17.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$4.4M$8.8M$13.2M$17.6M$17.6M$17.6M$17.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.6M$7.2M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$285K$569K$569K$569K$569K$569K$569K
Cumulative$0$12.7M$25.5M$37.9M$46.8M$46.8M$46.8M$46.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $46.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-371.2M$-371.2M-41.7%
Year 1$-382.3M+$31.2M$-351.1M-39.5%
Year 2$-393.8M+$46.8M$-347.0M-39.0%
Year 3$-405.6M+$46.8M$-358.8M-40.3%
Year 4$-417.8M+$46.8M$-371.0M-41.7%
Year 5$-430.3M+$46.8M$-383.5M-43.1%
$-3.71B
Entry EV (10x)
$-4.22B
Exit EV (11x)
$-506.7M
Value Created
$-383.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-591.2M
Organic Growth
$468.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-383.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$8.9M$13.3M$17.8M$21.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$8.8M$13.2M$17.6M$21.1M
A/R Days Reduction$5.4M$8.1M$10.8M$13.0M
Clean Claim Rate$285K$427K$569K$683K
Total$23.4M$35.1M$46.8M$56.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 184 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-41.7%-15.5%-3.9%4.5%
P4
Net-to-Gross22.6%17.3%22.3%28.6%
P51
Occupancy86.0%53.8%65.4%75.3%
P93
Rev/Bed$3.1M$1.2M$1.7M$2.5M
P89
Exp/Bed$4.4M$1.3M$1.8M$2.6M
P95

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML