Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ANAHEIM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ANAHEIM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050226 | CA | 223 beds | Current EBITDA $-24.9M → Pro Forma $-16.6M (+$8.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$158.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-24.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$8.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-16.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$6.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$8.3M
Modeled Uplift
$5.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.3M (vs $8.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$101K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$8.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.2M$3.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.0M$87K$3.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$485K$1.4M$1.9M$6.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$101K$101K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$791K$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$783K$1.6M$2.3M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$642K$1.3M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$51K$101K$101K$101K$101K$101K$101K
Cumulative$0$2.3M$4.5M$6.7M$8.3M$8.3M$8.3M$8.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $8.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-24.9M$-24.9M-15.8%
Year 1$-25.7M+$5.5M$-20.1M-12.7%
Year 2$-26.5M+$8.3M$-18.1M-11.5%
Year 3$-27.3M+$8.3M$-18.9M-12.0%
Year 4$-28.1M+$8.3M$-19.7M-12.5%
Year 5$-28.9M+$8.3M$-20.6M-13.0%
$-249.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-226.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$22.9M
Value Created
$-20.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-39.7M
Organic Growth
$83.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-20.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.6M$2.3M$3.1M$3.8M
A/R Days Reduction$963K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M
Clean Claim Rate$51K$76K$101K$122K
Total$4.2M$6.2M$8.3M$10.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 203 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-15.8%-16.7%-3.7%4.7%
P26
Net-to-Gross16.5%17.1%22.6%29.1%
P20
Occupancy40.7%50.4%63.2%74.9%
P10
Rev/Bed$709K$1.1M$1.6M$2.5M
P11
Exp/Bed$821K$1.2M$1.8M$2.6M
P15

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML