Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SHARP CHULA VISTA MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SHARP CHULA VISTA MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050222 | CA | 349 beds | Current EBITDA $-50.0M → Pro Forma $-22.7M (+$27.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$519.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-50.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$27.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-22.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$19.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$27.3M
Modeled Uplift
$19.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $19.1M (vs $27.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$332K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$27.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.4M$10.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.0M$285K$10.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.6M$4.7M$6.3M$19.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$332K$332K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.6M$5.2M$7.8M$10.4M$10.4M$10.4M$10.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.6M$5.1M$7.7M$10.3M$10.3M$10.3M$10.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$166K$332K$332K$332K$332K$332K$332K
Cumulative$0$7.4M$14.9M$22.1M$27.3M$27.3M$27.3M$27.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $27.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-50.0M$-50.0M-9.6%
Year 1$-51.5M+$18.2M$-33.3M-6.4%
Year 2$-53.0M+$27.3M$-25.7M-5.0%
Year 3$-54.6M+$27.3M$-27.3M-5.3%
Year 4$-56.2M+$27.3M$-28.9M-5.6%
Year 5$-57.9M+$27.3M$-30.6M-5.9%
$-499.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-336.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$162.9M
Value Created
$-30.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-79.6M
Organic Growth
$273.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-30.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.2M$7.8M$10.4M$12.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.1M$7.7M$10.3M$12.3M
A/R Days Reduction$3.2M$4.7M$6.3M$7.6M
Clean Claim Rate$166K$249K$332K$399K
Total$13.7M$20.5M$27.3M$32.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 156 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.6%-15.8%-4.2%3.7%
P38
Net-to-Gross16.8%17.6%22.6%28.9%
P21
Occupancy72.1%54.1%65.4%73.8%
P66
Rev/Bed$1.5M$1.3M$1.8M$2.6M
P37
Exp/Bed$1.6M$1.5M$2.0M$2.7M
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML