Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST JUDE MEDICAL CENTER FULLERTON 2026-04-26 09:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST JUDE MEDICAL CENTER FULLERTON
CCN 050168 | CA | 290 beds | Current EBITDA $-235.7M → Pro Forma $-203.0M (+$32.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$620.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-235.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$32.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-203.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$23.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$32.6M
Modeled Uplift
$23.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$9.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $23.4M (vs $32.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$12.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$12.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$397K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$32.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$12.4M$12.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$11.9M$341K$12.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.9M$5.6M$7.5M$23.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$397K$397K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.1M$6.2M$9.3M$12.4M$12.4M$12.4M$12.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.1M$6.1M$9.2M$12.3M$12.3M$12.3M$12.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.5M$5.0M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$198K$397K$397K$397K$397K$397K$397K
Cumulative$0$8.9M$17.8M$26.5M$32.6M$32.6M$32.6M$32.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $32.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-235.7M$-235.7M-38.0%
Year 1$-242.7M+$21.8M$-221.0M-35.6%
Year 2$-250.0M+$32.6M$-217.4M-35.1%
Year 3$-257.5M+$32.6M$-224.9M-36.3%
Year 4$-265.2M+$32.6M$-232.6M-37.5%
Year 5$-273.2M+$32.6M$-240.6M-38.8%
$-2.36B
Entry EV (10x)
$-2.65B
Exit EV (11x)
$-289.6M
Value Created
$-240.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-375.4M
Organic Growth
$326.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-240.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.2M$9.3M$12.4M$14.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.1M$9.2M$12.3M$14.7M
A/R Days Reduction$3.8M$5.7M$7.5M$9.1M
Clean Claim Rate$198K$298K$397K$476K
Total$16.3M$24.5M$32.6M$39.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 180 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-38.0%-15.5%-3.9%4.4%
P6
Net-to-Gross20.4%17.1%22.3%28.8%
P40
Occupancy73.5%53.8%65.4%75.4%
P72
Rev/Bed$2.1M$1.1M$1.6M$2.5M
P66
Exp/Bed$3.0M$1.2M$1.8M$2.6M
P84

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML