Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WOODLAND HEALTHCARE 2026-04-26 12:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WOODLAND HEALTHCARE
CCN 050127 | CA | 74 beds | Current EBITDA $-6.8M → Pro Forma $4.3M (+$11.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$211.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-6.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$11.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$8.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$11.1M
Modeled Uplift
$7.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.5M (vs $11.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$135K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$11.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.2M$4.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.1M$116K$4.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$649K$1.9M$2.6M$8.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$135K$135K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.0M$2.1M$3.1M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$858K$1.7M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$68K$135K$135K$135K$135K$135K$135K
Cumulative$0$3.0M$6.1M$9.0M$11.1M$11.1M$11.1M$11.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $11.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-13.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
19.7x
Headroom (turns)
303%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 303% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -13.2x, adding 112.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-6.8M$-6.8M-3.2%
Year 1$-7.0M+$7.4M$432K0.2%
Year 2$-7.2M+$11.1M$3.9M1.9%
Year 3$-7.4M+$11.1M$3.7M1.8%
Year 4$-7.6M+$11.1M$3.5M1.7%
Year 5$-7.9M+$11.1M$3.3M1.5%
$-67.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$35.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$103.7M
Value Created
$3.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-10.8M
Organic Growth
$111.3M
RCM Value Creation
$3.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.1M$3.2M$4.2M$5.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.1M$3.1M$4.2M$5.0M
A/R Days Reduction$1.3M$1.9M$2.6M$3.1M
Clean Claim Rate$68K$102K$135K$162K
Total$5.6M$8.3M$11.1M$13.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 146 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.2%-21.2%-4.7%3.5%
P57
Net-to-Gross23.3%19.4%25.7%38.3%
P43
Occupancy41.5%43.3%56.7%72.9%
P23
Rev/Bed$2.9M$503K$852K$2.1M
P90
Exp/Bed$3.0M$554K$965K$2.2M
P90

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML