Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — VALLEY PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — VALLEY PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL
CCN 050126 | CA | 333 beds | Current EBITDA $-104.9M → Pro Forma $-80.6M (+$24.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$462.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-104.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$24.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-80.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$17.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$24.3M
Modeled Uplift
$15.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.4M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $15.9M (vs $24.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$296K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$24.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.2M$9.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.9M$254K$9.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.4M$4.2M$5.6M$17.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$296K$296K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.3M$4.6M$6.9M$9.2M$9.2M$9.2M$9.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.3M$4.6M$6.9M$9.1M$9.1M$9.1M$9.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.9M$3.7M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$148K$296K$296K$296K$296K$296K$296K
Cumulative$0$6.6M$13.2M$19.7M$24.3M$24.3M$24.3M$24.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $24.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-104.9M$-104.9M-22.7%
Year 1$-108.0M+$16.2M$-91.8M-19.9%
Year 2$-111.3M+$24.3M$-87.0M-18.8%
Year 3$-114.6M+$24.3M$-90.3M-19.6%
Year 4$-118.1M+$24.3M$-93.8M-20.3%
Year 5$-121.6M+$24.3M$-97.3M-21.1%
$-1.05B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.07B
Exit EV (11x)
$-21.3M
Value Created
$-97.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-167.1M
Organic Growth
$243.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-97.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.6M$6.9M$9.2M$11.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.6M$6.9M$9.1M$11.0M
A/R Days Reduction$2.8M$4.2M$5.6M$6.7M
Clean Claim Rate$148K$222K$296K$355K
Total$12.2M$18.2M$24.3M$29.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 167 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-22.7%-15.0%-3.9%4.4%
P15
Net-to-Gross48.6%17.5%22.8%28.9%
P95
Occupancy55.1%54.0%65.4%75.3%
P28
Rev/Bed$1.4M$1.3M$1.8M$2.6M
P31
Exp/Bed$1.7M$1.4M$2.0M$2.6M
P41

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML