Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MARIAN MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MARIAN MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050107 | CA | 252 beds | Current EBITDA $35.7M → Pro Forma $75.2M (+$39.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$751.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$35.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$39.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$75.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$28.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$39.5M
Modeled Uplift
$28.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$10.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $28.9M (vs $39.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$15.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$14.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$9.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$481K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$39.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$15.0M$15.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$14.5M$413K$14.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.3M$6.8M$9.1M$28.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$481K$481K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.8M$7.5M$11.3M$15.0M$15.0M$15.0M$15.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.7M$7.4M$11.2M$14.9M$14.9M$14.9M$14.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.0M$6.1M$9.1M$9.1M$9.1M$9.1M$9.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$240K$481K$481K$481K$481K$481K$481K
Cumulative$0$10.8M$21.5M$32.1M$39.5M$39.5M$39.5M$39.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $39.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x68% / 13.3x72% / 15.2x76% / 17.0x78% / 17.9x80% / 18.9x
9.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.1x71% / 14.8x73% / 15.6x75% / 16.4x
10.0x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.4x
11.0x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.8x
12.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.5x
Headroom (turns)
38%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 38% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.0x, adding 4.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$35.7M$35.7M4.7%
Year 1$36.7M+$26.4M$63.1M8.4%
Year 2$37.9M+$39.5M$77.4M10.3%
Year 3$39.0M+$39.5M$78.5M10.4%
Year 4$40.2M+$39.5M$79.7M10.6%
Year 5$41.4M+$39.5M$80.9M10.8%
$356.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$889.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$533.1M
Value Created
$80.9M
Exit EBITDA
$56.8M
Organic Growth
$395.3M
RCM Value Creation
$80.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$7.5M$11.3M$15.0M$18.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.4M$11.2M$14.9M$17.9M
A/R Days Reduction$4.6M$6.9M$9.1M$11.0M
Clean Claim Rate$240K$361K$481K$577K
Total$19.8M$29.7M$39.5M$47.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 191 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.7%-15.6%-4.0%4.7%
P75
Net-to-Gross24.4%17.1%22.2%28.7%
P61
Occupancy72.5%53.1%65.4%75.5%
P69
Rev/Bed$3.0M$1.1M$1.6M$2.5M
P85
Exp/Bed$2.8M$1.2M$1.8M$2.6M
P81

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML