Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ADVENTIST HEALTH WHITE MEMORIAL 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ADVENTIST HEALTH WHITE MEMORIAL
CCN 050103 | CA | 310 beds | Current EBITDA $-117.8M → Pro Forma $-96.5M (+$21.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$404.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-117.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$21.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-96.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$15.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$21.3M
Modeled Uplift
$15.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $15.0M (vs $21.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$259K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$21.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.1M$8.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.8M$222K$8.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.7M$4.9M$15.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$259K$259K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.0M$4.0M$6.1M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.0M$4.0M$6.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.6M$3.3M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$129K$259K$259K$259K$259K$259K$259K
Cumulative$0$5.8M$11.6M$17.3M$21.3M$21.3M$21.3M$21.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $21.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-117.8M$-117.8M-29.1%
Year 1$-121.3M+$14.2M$-107.1M-26.5%
Year 2$-124.9M+$21.3M$-103.7M-25.6%
Year 3$-128.7M+$21.3M$-107.4M-26.6%
Year 4$-132.5M+$21.3M$-111.3M-27.5%
Year 5$-136.5M+$21.3M$-115.2M-28.5%
$-1.18B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.27B
Exit EV (11x)
$-90.1M
Value Created
$-115.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-187.6M
Organic Growth
$212.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-115.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.0M$6.1M$8.1M$9.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.0M$6.0M$8.0M$9.6M
A/R Days Reduction$2.5M$3.7M$4.9M$5.9M
Clean Claim Rate$129K$194K$259K$311K
Total$10.6M$16.0M$21.3M$25.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 173 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-29.1%-15.3%-3.6%4.4%
P12
Net-to-Gross13.9%17.2%22.6%28.9%
P12
Occupancy73.8%53.9%65.4%75.3%
P74
Rev/Bed$1.3M$1.2M$1.7M$2.5M
P28
Exp/Bed$1.7M$1.3M$1.8M$2.6M
P42

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML