Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF RIVERSIDE 2026-04-26 14:31 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF RIVERSIDE
CCN 050102 | CA | 193 beds | Current EBITDA $6.1M → Pro Forma $13.4M (+$7.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$139.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$13.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$7.3M
Modeled Uplift
$4.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.6M (vs $7.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$89K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.8M$2.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.7M$76K$2.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$426K$1.3M$1.7M$5.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$89K$89K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$695K$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$688K$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$564K$1.1M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$44K$89K$89K$89K$89K$89K$89K
Cumulative$0$2.0M$4.0M$5.9M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x69% / 14.0x74% / 15.9x78% / 17.8x80% / 18.8x82% / 19.7x
9.0x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.8x73% / 15.5x75% / 16.3x77% / 17.2x
10.0x60% / 10.5x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.6x70% / 14.4x72% / 15.1x
11.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x68% / 13.5x
12.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.6x
Headroom (turns)
41%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 41% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.9x, adding 4.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.1M$6.1M4.4%
Year 1$6.3M+$4.9M$11.2M8.0%
Year 2$6.5M+$7.3M$13.8M9.9%
Year 3$6.7M+$7.3M$14.0M10.1%
Year 4$6.9M+$7.3M$14.2M10.2%
Year 5$7.1M+$7.3M$14.4M10.4%
$61.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$158.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$97.2M
Value Created
$14.4M
Exit EBITDA
$9.7M
Organic Growth
$73.1M
RCM Value Creation
$14.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.3M
A/R Days Reduction$845K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M
Clean Claim Rate$44K$67K$89K$107K
Total$3.7M$5.5M$7.3M$8.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 220 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.4%-17.1%-4.6%4.5%
P74
Net-to-Gross18.2%17.3%22.1%28.8%
P28
Occupancy37.7%47.1%61.5%73.4%
P11
Rev/Bed$720K$896K$1.5M$2.3M
P18
Exp/Bed$688K$958K$1.7M$2.4M
P15

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML