Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SAN ANTONIO REGIONAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 11:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SAN ANTONIO REGIONAL HOSPITAL
CCN 050099 | CA | 363 beds | Current EBITDA $12.6M → Pro Forma $36.2M (+$23.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$447.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$12.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$23.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$36.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$17.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$23.5M
Modeled Uplift
$15.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.8M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $15.7M (vs $23.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$286K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$23.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.9M$8.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.6M$246K$8.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.4M$4.1M$5.4M$17.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$286K$286K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.2M$4.5M$6.7M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.6M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$143K$286K$286K$286K$286K$286K$286K
Cumulative$0$6.4M$12.8M$19.1M$23.5M$23.5M$23.5M$23.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $23.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x80% / 18.9x84% / 21.3x88% / 23.8x90% / 25.0x92% / 26.2x
9.0x75% / 16.4x79% / 18.6x83% / 20.8x85% / 21.9x87% / 22.9x
10.0x71% / 14.4x75% / 16.4x79% / 18.4x81% / 19.4x83% / 20.3x
11.0x67% / 12.8x71% / 14.6x75% / 16.4x77% / 17.3x79% / 18.2x
12.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.1x71% / 14.8x73% / 15.6x75% / 16.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.5x
Headroom (turns)
55%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 55% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.0x, adding 5.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$12.6M$12.6M2.8%
Year 1$13.0M+$15.7M$28.7M6.4%
Year 2$13.4M+$23.5M$36.9M8.3%
Year 3$13.8M+$23.5M$37.3M8.3%
Year 4$14.2M+$23.5M$37.7M8.4%
Year 5$14.6M+$23.5M$38.2M8.5%
$126.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$419.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$293.6M
Value Created
$38.2M
Exit EBITDA
$20.1M
Organic Growth
$235.3M
RCM Value Creation
$38.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.5M$6.7M$8.9M$10.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.4M$6.6M$8.9M$10.6M
A/R Days Reduction$2.7M$4.1M$5.4M$6.5M
Clean Claim Rate$143K$215K$286K$344K
Total$11.8M$17.7M$23.5M$28.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 156 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.8%-15.8%-4.4%3.5%
P72
Net-to-Gross13.7%17.6%22.7%28.9%
P8
Occupancy58.8%54.3%65.4%74.2%
P35
Rev/Bed$1.2M$1.3M$1.9M$2.7M
P20
Exp/Bed$1.2M$1.5M$2.0M$2.8M
P16

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML