Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WEST COVINA MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:32 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WEST COVINA MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050096 | CA | 13 beds | Current EBITDA $22.5M → Pro Forma $24.6M (+$2.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$40.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$22.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$24.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$2.1M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$782K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $2.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$812K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$804K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$494K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$26K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$812K$812K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$781K$22K$804K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$125K$369K$494K$1.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$26K$26K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$203K$406K$609K$812K$812K$812K$812K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$201K$402K$603K$804K$804K$804K$804K
A/R Days Reduction$0$165K$329K$494K$494K$494K$494K$494K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K
Cumulative$0$581K$1.2M$1.7M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
9.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x
10.0x33% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x
11.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.2x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.3x41% / 5.7x
12.0x23% / 2.9x29% / 3.5x33% / 4.2x35% / 4.6x37% / 4.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
-1.2x
Headroom (turns)
-19%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -19% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.7x, adding 0.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$22.5M$22.5M55.3%
Year 1$23.1M+$1.4M$24.6M60.5%
Year 2$23.8M+$2.1M$26.0M64.0%
Year 3$24.5M+$2.1M$26.7M65.7%
Year 4$25.3M+$2.1M$27.4M67.6%
Year 5$26.0M+$2.1M$28.2M69.4%
$224.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$310.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$85.3M
Value Created
$28.2M
Exit EBITDA
$35.8M
Organic Growth
$21.4M
RCM Value Creation
$28.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$406K$609K$812K$974K
Denial Rate Reductio$402K$603K$804K$964K
A/R Days Reduction$247K$370K$494K$593K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$19K$26K$31K
Total$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 50 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin55.3%-22.5%-10.9%-0.2%
P98
Net-to-Gross64.2%31.6%45.9%63.8%
P74
Occupancy16.1%19.5%36.0%64.2%
P18
Rev/Bed$3.1M$1.1M$2.3M$3.9M
P68
Exp/Bed$1.4M$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M
P26

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML