Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SONOMA VALLEY HEALTH CARE DISTRICT 2026-04-26 11:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SONOMA VALLEY HEALTH CARE DISTRICT
CCN 050090 | CA | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $-9.1M → Pro Forma $-6.2M (+$2.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$55.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-9.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-6.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$2.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$954K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.9M (vs $2.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$669K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$35K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.1M$30K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$169K$501K$669K$2.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$35K$35K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT61.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$275K$550K$825K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$272K$545K$817K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$223K$446K$669K$669K$669K$669K$669K
Clean Claim Rate$0$18K$35K$35K$35K$35K$35K$35K
Cumulative$0$788K$1.6M$2.3M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-9.1M$-9.1M-16.5%
Year 1$-9.3M+$1.9M$-7.4M-13.5%
Year 2$-9.6M+$2.9M$-6.7M-12.2%
Year 3$-9.9M+$2.9M$-7.0M-12.7%
Year 4$-10.2M+$2.9M$-7.3M-13.3%
Year 5$-10.5M+$2.9M$-7.6M-13.8%
$-90.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-83.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$6.9M
Value Created
$-7.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-14.4M
Organic Growth
$28.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-7.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$550K$825K$1.1M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$545K$817K$1.1M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$335K$502K$669K$803K
Clean Claim Rate$18K$26K$35K$42K
Total$1.4M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 64 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-16.5%-19.2%-9.6%0.4%
P31
Net-to-Gross17.0%29.6%41.0%61.8%
P3
Occupancy36.8%27.2%39.4%70.6%
P42
Rev/Bed$2.3M$991K$2.2M$3.3M
P52
Exp/Bed$2.7M$1.0M$2.1M$3.3M
P55

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML