Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. JOHNS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:32 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. JOHNS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050082 | CA | 298 beds | Current EBITDA $-65.6M → Pro Forma $-36.5M (+$29.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$553.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-65.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$29.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-36.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$21.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$29.1M
Modeled Uplift
$20.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$9.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $20.0M (vs $29.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$11.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$11.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$354K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$29.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$11.1M$11.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.7M$304K$11.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.7M$5.0M$6.7M$21.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$354K$354K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.8M$5.5M$8.3M$11.1M$11.1M$11.1M$11.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.7M$5.5M$8.2M$11.0M$11.0M$11.0M$11.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.2M$4.5M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$177K$354K$354K$354K$354K$354K$354K
Cumulative$0$7.9M$15.9M$23.6M$29.1M$29.1M$29.1M$29.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $29.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-65.6M$-65.6M-11.9%
Year 1$-67.6M+$19.4M$-48.2M-8.7%
Year 2$-69.6M+$29.1M$-40.5M-7.3%
Year 3$-71.7M+$29.1M$-42.6M-7.7%
Year 4$-73.9M+$29.1M$-44.7M-8.1%
Year 5$-76.1M+$29.1M$-47.0M-8.5%
$-656.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-516.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$139.7M
Value Created
$-47.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-104.5M
Organic Growth
$291.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-47.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.5M$8.3M$11.1M$13.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.5M$8.2M$11.0M$13.1M
A/R Days Reduction$3.4M$5.1M$6.7M$8.1M
Clean Claim Rate$177K$266K$354K$425K
Total$14.6M$21.8M$29.1M$34.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 178 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-11.9%-15.8%-3.9%4.4%
P31
Net-to-Gross22.1%17.2%22.4%28.9%
P48
Occupancy60.1%53.7%65.4%75.3%
P40
Rev/Bed$1.9M$1.2M$1.7M$2.5M
P55
Exp/Bed$2.1M$1.3M$1.9M$2.6M
P58

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML