Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PROVIDENCE LTTL CO MARY MC SAN PEDRO 2026-04-26 12:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PROVIDENCE LTTL CO MARY MC SAN PEDRO
CCN 050078 | CA | 96 beds | Current EBITDA $-54.1M → Pro Forma $-43.6M (+$10.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$199.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-54.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$10.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-43.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$10.5M
Modeled Uplift
$7.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.5M (vs $10.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$128K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$10.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.0M$4.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.8M$110K$3.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$612K$1.8M$2.4M$7.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$128K$128K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$997K$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$987K$2.0M$3.0M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$809K$1.6M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$64K$128K$128K$128K$128K$128K$128K
Cumulative$0$2.9M$5.7M$8.5M$10.5M$10.5M$10.5M$10.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $10.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-54.1M$-54.1M-27.1%
Year 1$-55.7M+$7.0M$-48.7M-24.4%
Year 2$-57.4M+$10.5M$-46.9M-23.5%
Year 3$-59.1M+$10.5M$-48.6M-24.4%
Year 4$-60.9M+$10.5M$-50.4M-25.3%
Year 5$-62.7M+$10.5M$-52.2M-26.2%
$-541.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-574.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$-33.5M
Value Created
$-52.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-86.2M
Organic Growth
$104.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-52.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.0M$3.0M$3.9M$4.7M
A/R Days Reduction$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
Clean Claim Rate$64K$96K$128K$153K
Total$5.2M$7.9M$10.5M$12.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 172 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-27.1%-19.8%-3.7%4.3%
P18
Net-to-Gross21.6%18.2%23.5%35.5%
P39
Occupancy62.6%43.9%57.0%73.7%
P59
Rev/Bed$2.1M$506K$950K$2.1M
P74
Exp/Bed$2.6M$591K$1.1M$2.2M
P83

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML