Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KFH - VALLEJO 2026-04-26 05:22 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KFH - VALLEJO
CCN 050073 | CA | 184 beds | Current EBITDA $1.8M → Pro Forma $29.8M (+$28.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$531.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$28.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$29.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$20.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$28.0M
Modeled Uplift
$19.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.7M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $19.3M (vs $28.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$340K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$28.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.6M$10.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.2M$292K$10.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.6M$4.8M$6.5M$20.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$340K$340K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.7M$5.3M$8.0M$10.6M$10.6M$10.6M$10.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.6M$5.3M$7.9M$10.5M$10.5M$10.5M$10.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.2M$4.3M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$170K$340K$340K$340K$340K$340K$340K
Cumulative$0$7.6M$15.2M$22.7M$28.0M$28.0M$28.0M$28.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $28.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x160% / 118.4x166% / 131.9x171% / 145.4x173% / 152.2x176% / 158.9x
9.0x154% / 104.9x159% / 116.9x164% / 128.9x167% / 134.9x169% / 140.9x
10.0x148% / 94.1x154% / 104.9x159% / 115.7x161% / 121.1x163% / 126.5x
11.0x143% / 85.2x149% / 95.0x154% / 104.9x156% / 109.8x158% / 114.7x
12.0x139% / 77.8x144% / 86.9x149% / 95.9x151% / 100.4x154% / 104.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.0x
Headroom (turns)
92%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 92% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.5x, adding 7.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.8M$1.8M0.3%
Year 1$1.9M+$18.6M$20.5M3.9%
Year 2$1.9M+$28.0M$29.9M5.6%
Year 3$2.0M+$28.0M$29.9M5.6%
Year 4$2.0M+$28.0M$30.0M5.6%
Year 5$2.1M+$28.0M$30.1M5.7%
$18.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$330.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$312.7M
Value Created
$30.1M
Exit EBITDA
$2.9M
Organic Growth
$279.7M
RCM Value Creation
$30.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.3M$8.0M$10.6M$12.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.3M$7.9M$10.5M$12.6M
A/R Days Reduction$3.2M$4.9M$6.5M$7.8M
Clean Claim Rate$170K$255K$340K$408K
Total$14.0M$21.0M$28.0M$33.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 217 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.3%-17.4%-4.5%4.6%
P64
Net-to-Gross28.7%17.7%22.1%28.8%
P75
Occupancy53.1%47.1%60.9%73.6%
P34
Rev/Bed$2.9M$847K$1.4M$2.3M
P87
Exp/Bed$2.9M$937K$1.6M$2.4M
P85

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML